WIP: Fixed bug in graph

[jesper-friis]

Description:

Fixed bug in graph

Type of change:

• Bug fix.
• New feature.
• Documentation update.

Checklist:

This checklist can be used as a help for the reviewer.

• Is the code easy to read and understand?
• Are comments for humans to read, not computers to disregard?
• Does a new feature has an accompanying new test (in the CI or unit testing schemes)?
• Has the documentation been updated as necessary?
• Does this close the issue?
• Is the change limited to the issue?
• Are errors handled for all outcomes?
• Does the new feature provide new restrictions on dependencies, and if so is this documented?

Comments:

[francescalb]

@jesper-friis I think this bug (not described what is was), was fixed in #441 in which the style for the edges that are not defines is given as default with the following lines in graph.py:
warnings.warn(
f"Style not defined for relation {name}. "
"Resorting to default style."
)
rattrs = self.style.get("default_relation", {})
Can you verify that this solves your problem? If not, can you describe the bug a little better?

[jesper-friis]

@jesper-friis I think this bug (not described what is was), was fixed in #441 in which the style for the edges that are not defines is given as default with the following lines in graph.py: warnings.warn( f"Style not defined for relation {name}. " "Resorting to default style." ) rattrs = self.style.get("default_relation", {}) Can you verify that this solves your problem? If not, can you describe the bug a little better?

I have completely forgotten what the bug was. Should we simply drop this PR?

[francescalb]

Then, I close it. Closed with #441