Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.60.0 secret collisions are problematic #1458

Closed
derrickburns opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

0.60.0 secret collisions are problematic #1458

derrickburns opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@derrickburns
Copy link
Contributor

derrickburns commented Apr 24, 2019

Per @derrickburns' ambassador-log.txt:

default/ambassador-dbc6697c4-zvlgn[ambassador]: 2019-04-24 06:25:05 diagd 0.60.0 [P46TAmbassadorEventWatcher] ERROR: ambassador-certs.qa1.1: <RichStatus BAD error=<Secret ambassador-certs.qa1.1> defines Secret ambassador-certs, which is already defined by ambassador-certs.default.1 hostname=ambassador-dbc6697c4-zvlgn version=0.60.0>
default/ambassador-dbc6697c4-bm4f6[ambassador]: 2019-04-24 06:25:05 diagd 0.60.0 [P43TAmbassadorEventWatcher] ERROR: tidepool-org.qa1.1: <RichStatus BAD error=<Secret tidepool-org.qa1.1> defines Secret tidepool-org, which is already defined by tidepool-org.gloo-system.1 hostname=ambassador-dbc6697c4-bm4f6 version=0.60.0>

So, for example, we have an ambassador-certs secret in namespace qa1 and a different ambassador-certs secret in namespace default. Ambassador, however, is deciding that they're the same secret, and throwing away the secret from namespace default. This is a problem.

Versions (please complete the following information):

  • Ambassador: 0.6.0
  • Kubernetes environment: Amazon EKS
  • Version 1.11.5

(Description heavily edited by @kflynn to try to avoid burying the lede)

@kflynn kflynn changed the title Failure when installing 0.60.0 0.60.0 secret collisions are problematic Apr 25, 2019
@kflynn
Copy link
Member

kflynn commented Apr 25, 2019

Closing as a dup of #1467, because that one has more detailed information. Thanks!

@kflynn kflynn closed this as completed Apr 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants