From eab98a29284bf29c30373b98e51e71d208d44c46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sandstrom <alexander@skovik.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:18:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update links to Ember Guide

---
 addon/-private/system/model/model.js | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/addon/-private/system/model/model.js b/addon/-private/system/model/model.js
index c44dbfeccb9..521d7425088 100644
--- a/addon/-private/system/model/model.js
+++ b/addon/-private/system/model/model.js
@@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ Model.reopenClass({
     } else {
       //No inverse was specified manually, we need to use a heuristic to guess one
       if (propertyMeta.parentType && propertyMeta.type === propertyMeta.parentType.modelName) {
-        warn(`Detected a reflexive relationship by the name of '${name}' without an inverse option. Look at https://emberjs.com/guides/models/defining-models/#toc_reflexive-relation for how to explicitly specify inverses.`, false, {
+        warn(`Detected a reflexive relationship by the name of '${name}' without an inverse option. Look at https://guides.emberjs.com/current/models/relationships/#toc_reflexive-relations for how to explicitly specify inverses.`, false, {
           id: 'ds.model.reflexive-relationship-without-inverse'
         });
       }
@@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ Model.reopenClass({
       });
 
       assert("You defined the '" + name + "' relationship on " + this + ", but you defined the inverse relationships of type " +
-        inverseType.toString() + " multiple times. Look at https://emberjs.com/guides/models/defining-models/#toc_explicit-inverses for how to explicitly specify inverses",
+        inverseType.toString() + " multiple times. Look at https://guides.emberjs.com/current/models/relationships/#toc_explicit-inverses for how to explicitly specify inverses",
         filteredRelationships.length < 2);
 
       if (filteredRelationships.length === 1 ) {
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ Model.reopenClass({
       }
 
       assert("You defined the '" + name + "' relationship on " + this + ", but multiple possible inverse relationships of type " +
-        this + " were found on " + inverseType + ". Look at https://emberjs.com/guides/models/defining-models/#toc_explicit-inverses for how to explicitly specify inverses",
+        this + " were found on " + inverseType + ". Look at https://guides.emberjs.com/current/models/relationships/#toc_explicit-inverses for how to explicitly specify inverses",
         possibleRelationships.length === 1);
 
       inverseName = possibleRelationships[0].name;

From 8da0f4fa67d576f19441bada2f36310d463d1302 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sandstrom <alexander@skovik.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:33:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Update inverse-test.js

---
 tests/integration/inverse-test.js | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/integration/inverse-test.js b/tests/integration/inverse-test.js
index d2881b9dd23..2656594cee7 100644
--- a/tests/integration/inverse-test.js
+++ b/tests/integration/inverse-test.js
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ testInDebug("Errors out if you define 2 inverses to the same model", function(as
 
   assert.expectAssertion(() => {
     User.inverseFor('job', store);
-  }, "You defined the 'job' relationship on user, but you defined the inverse relationships of type job multiple times. Look at https://emberjs.com/guides/models/defining-models/#toc_explicit-inverses for how to explicitly specify inverses");
+  }, /^You defined the 'job' relationship on user, but you defined the inverse relationships of type job multiple times/i);
 });