Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

capture more network information to improve waterfall #152

Closed
4 tasks done
vigneshshanmugam opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

capture more network information to improve waterfall #152

vigneshshanmugam opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@vigneshshanmugam
Copy link
Member

vigneshshanmugam commented Nov 30, 2020

Couple of improvements that we can do to improve the step level waterfall in the UI

  • Move the overall timing calculation logic in the UI to the agent to improve the performance feat: add request timing calculation for waterfall #168
  • Use requestSentime and responseReceivedTime in favor of start/end time and use the monotonic clock in start
    and end time
  • Capture the step index info for all the netinfo events to make querying easier
  • Fix the timestamp to get the value of when the event got generated vs when the event is written to stdout which is after journey end.
    + [ ] Enhance the additional headers information by listening to requestWillBeSentExtraInfo and responseReceivedExtraInfo event
    + [ ] Figure out if an entry is from the cache by using requestServedFromCache event.
@paulb-elastic
Copy link
Contributor

Removing capture web vitals and other RUM metrics - #120 from the list of requirements as we're tracking #120 separately.

@andrewvc
Copy link
Contributor

andrewvc commented Jan 6, 2021

Since we don't actually need the last two items for our UI right now I've crossed this out, and am closing the issue.

@andrewvc andrewvc closed this as completed Jan 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants