-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Synthetics Beta Packaging, Docker, Fleet, Build, and other Concerns #140
Labels
Comments
|
This was referenced Nov 20, 2020
For reference, there is an other issue that is specifically about whether or not to bundle Synthetics/Playwright/Chromium/etc with the Heartbeat docker image, but this also includes a discussion about the auto-update behaviour. |
Reviewed with @andrewvc and everything on here has either already done, or is no longer relevant, so closing. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
For synthetics to reach beta (hopefully as soon as 7.11) and later GA (as soon as 7.12), we'll need to have a more robust packaging system that makes sense in the context of the wider stack.
Today, we have two things we version, the stack, and the APM agents (e.g. RUM, Java, etc.). The APM agents usually have their own versioning system independent of the stack. We can consider, for our purposes, the synthetics package to be an agent. We also need to have special dependencies present in our docker image to run synthetics, and we also need to eventually support the Elastic agent.
I think where we want to wind up here is in the following spot:
I'd love some opinions on this strategy. Some questions I can foresee:
CC @paulb-elastic @drewpost @kuisathaverat @ruflin @mostlyjason @jahtalab @vigneshshanmugam @shahzad31 @Kerry350
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: