Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link to the 7.14.0 ES Python client docs. #1554

Merged

Conversation

michaelbaamonde
Copy link
Contributor

This is the version that Rally depends on, so pointing users elsewhere could be misleading.

This is the version that Rally depends on, so pointing users elsewhere could be
misleading.
@michaelbaamonde
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine run tests please

@michaelbaamonde
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test failures appear to be due to a network error when attempting to build the Docker image.

@michaelbaamonde michaelbaamonde added the :Docs Changes to the documentation label Aug 1, 2022
@michaelbaamonde
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine run tests please

1 similar comment
@michaelbaamonde
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine run tests please

Copy link
Contributor

@dliappis dliappis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. Left a comment that could help reduce maintenance burden in the future.

@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ By default, the command line reporter will print the results only on standard ou

With this option you can customize Rally's internal Elasticsearch client.

It accepts a list of comma-separated key-value pairs. The key-value pairs have to be delimited by a colon. These options are passed directly to the Elasticsearch Python client API. See `their documentation on a list of supported options <http://elasticsearch-py.readthedocs.io/en/master/api.html#elasticsearch.Elasticsearch>`_.
It accepts a list of comma-separated key-value pairs. The key-value pairs have to be delimited by a colon. These options are passed directly to the Elasticsearch Python client API. See `their documentation on a list of supported options <https://elasticsearch-py.readthedocs.io/en/v7.14.0/api.html#elasticsearch>`_.
Copy link
Contributor

@dliappis dliappis Aug 3, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the sake of not having to remember changing the version here when we upgrade elasticsearch[async] could we leverage a variable, similar to how we do for MIN_PY_VER? This is achieved with real python code on docs/conf.py so we could determine the version programmatically.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect, didn't even occur to me. I'll do that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in 8fb9a3d

@michaelbaamonde
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine run tests please

Copy link
Contributor

@DJRickyB DJRickyB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. You may need to forcibly merge given the checks have changed while this has been open; no need of further review from me on that

Copy link
Member

@inqueue inqueue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@michaelbaamonde michaelbaamonde merged commit 8ba7980 into elastic:master Aug 17, 2022
@michaelbaamonde michaelbaamonde deleted the link-to-7.14-python-client-docs branch August 17, 2022 13:04
@pquentin pquentin added this to the 2.7.0 milestone Nov 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Docs Changes to the documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants