Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support datastreams in Rally #1053

Closed
5 tasks done
gingerwizard opened this issue Sep 1, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

Support datastreams in Rally #1053

gingerwizard opened this issue Sep 1, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Improves the status quo

Comments

@gingerwizard
Copy link

gingerwizard commented Sep 1, 2020

Propose the following features be core operations in Rally due to the applicability to common workloads:

Datastreams support a number of other operations e.g. Updating documents by query. I don't believe these will be used regularly in workloads however and can be implemented as custom runners if needed.

@gingerwizard gingerwizard added enhancement Improves the status quo discuss Needs further clarification from the team labels Sep 1, 2020
@gingerwizard gingerwizard self-assigned this Sep 1, 2020
@hub-cap
Copy link
Contributor

hub-cap commented Sep 23, 2020

I have hit an issue on the a track that also needs create-datastream, and would love to see this done as a good first step. Lets chat tomorrow @gingerwizard about timing of this first step.

@gingerwizard
Copy link
Author

Code merged. Pending IT and docs.

@gingerwizard
Copy link
Author

gingerwizard commented Nov 2, 2020

@danielmitterdorfer we will need data streams stats. My initial instinct is to add as a runner like https://esrally.readthedocs.io/en/stable/track.html?highlight=index%20stats#index-stats? Any other approaches you'd like to consider? Happy to own.

@danielmitterdorfer
Copy link
Member

If we want custom metrics I suggest we implement a so-called telemetry device similar to:

class IndexStats(InternalTelemetryDevice):
.

@gingerwizard
Copy link
Author

👍 appreciate the guidance.

@dliappis dliappis removed the discuss Needs further clarification from the team label Nov 9, 2020
@b-deam b-deam closed this as completed Jul 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improves the status quo
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants