Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.x] use waitFor in place of act (#201921) #201956

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 8.x:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

","sha":"6e5f5ed3bd56ce18ebb04c38ef00814e1a4e7bb6","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.18.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","Team:Fleet","v9.0.0","backport:prev-minor"],"title":"use waitFor in place of act","number":201921,"url":"https://github.com//pull/201921","mergeCommit":{"message":"use waitFor in place of act (#201921)\n\n## Summary\r\n\r\nFixes incorrect usage of act for assertions. Informed from\r\nhttps://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-pull-request/builds/254649#019369dd-02e4-4d1e-9c45-face1da80884\r\n\r\n### Before\r\n\r\n

\"Screenshot

\r\n\r\n## After\r\n\r\n

\"Screenshot

\r\n\r\n\r\n","sha":"6e5f5ed3bd56ce18ebb04c38ef00814e1a4e7bb6"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com//pull/201921","number":201921,"mergeCommit":{"message":"use waitFor in place of act (#201921)\n\n## Summary\r\n\r\nFixes incorrect usage of act for assertions. Informed from\r\nhttps://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-pull-request/builds/254649#019369dd-02e4-4d1e-9c45-face1da80884\r\n\r\n### Before\r\n\r\n

\"Screenshot

\r\n\r\n## After\r\n\r\n

\"Screenshot

\r\n\r\n\r\n","sha":"6e5f5ed3bd56ce18ebb04c38ef00814e1a4e7bb6"}}]}] BACKPORT-->

## Summary

Fixes incorrect usage of act for assertions. Informed from
https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-pull-request/builds/254649#019369dd-02e4-4d1e-9c45-face1da80884

### Before

<img width="1239" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-27 at 10 46 23"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/89fb0142-add8-401d-b270-d9bc8a3cbe23">

## After

<img width="1052" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-27 at 10 46 34"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/61f4d278-676c-4761-a003-1e22714cf5b7">

<!--
### Checklist

Check the PR satisfies following conditions.

Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well.

- [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing
guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses
sentence case text and includes [i18n
support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md)
- [ ]
[Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html)
was added for features that require explanation or tutorials
- [ ] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be
allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker
list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker)
- [ ] This was checked for breaking HTTP API changes, and any breaking
changes have been approved by the breaking-change committee. The
`release_note:breaking` label should be applied in these situations.
- [ ] [Flaky Test
Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was
used on any tests changed
- [ ] The PR description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,
and the correct `release_note:*` label is applied per the
[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)

### Identify risks

Does this PR introduce any risks? For example, consider risks like hard
to test bugs, performance regression, potential of data loss.

Describe the risk, its severity, and mitigation for each identified
risk. Invite stakeholders and evaluate how to proceed before merging.

- [ ] [See some risk
examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx)
- [ ] ...

-->

(cherry picked from commit 6e5f5ed)
@kibanamachine kibanamachine enabled auto-merge (squash) November 27, 2024 12:16
@botelastic botelastic bot added the Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team label Nov 27, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/fleet (Team:Fleet)

@kibanamachine kibanamachine merged commit ca4f391 into elastic:8.x Nov 27, 2024
13 checks passed
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Test Failures

  • [job] [logs] Jest Tests #7 / useMonitorStatusData handles resize events and requests based on new data

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

cc @eokoneyo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants