Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Alerting UI] Extend JSON editor validation to check the context variable type #79789

Closed
YulNaumenko opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
estimate:needs-research Estimated as too large and requires research to break down into workable issues Feature:Alerting/RuleActions Issues related to the Actions attached to Rules on the Alerting Framework Feature:Alerting Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) UX

Comments

@YulNaumenko
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the feature described in the issue #78877, we should improve JSON validation to be able to add context variables of non string types (number, boolean, etc.). If the value doesn't have a quotas it should be not a string to avoid a broken JSON.
Examples is a Webhook and Index action types which use JSON editor for defining a document body, when creating an alert.

@YulNaumenko YulNaumenko added Feature:Alerting Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) labels Oct 6, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-alerting-services (Team:Alerting Services)

@mikecote
Copy link
Contributor

Moving from 7.12 - Candidates to 7.x - Candidates.

@mikecote
Copy link
Contributor

mikecote commented Feb 5, 2021

Moving from 7.x - Candidates to 8.x - Candidates (Backlog) after the latest 7.x planning session.

@gmmorris gmmorris added the Feature:Alerting/RuleActions Issues related to the Actions attached to Rules on the Alerting Framework label Jul 1, 2021
@gmmorris gmmorris added the loe:needs-research This issue requires some research before it can be worked on or estimated label Jul 14, 2021
@gmmorris gmmorris added UX estimate:needs-research Estimated as too large and requires research to break down into workable issues labels Aug 13, 2021
@gmmorris gmmorris removed the loe:needs-research This issue requires some research before it can be worked on or estimated label Sep 2, 2021
@ymao1
Copy link
Contributor

ymao1 commented Nov 19, 2021

@YulNaumenko Is this a duplicate of #78877?

@kobelb kobelb added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jan 31, 2022
@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jan 31, 2022
@mikecote
Copy link
Contributor

Closing due to lack of activity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
estimate:needs-research Estimated as too large and requires research to break down into workable issues Feature:Alerting/RuleActions Issues related to the Actions attached to Rules on the Alerting Framework Feature:Alerting Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) UX
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants