Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fleet]: Saved object conflict error is displayed while adding integration in default space when My first agent policy is created under Space2. #194783

Closed
amolnater-qasource opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. QA:Validated Issue has been validated by QA Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team

Comments

@amolnater-qasource
Copy link

Kibana Build details:

VERSION: 8.16.0 SNAPSHOT
BUILD: 78702
COMMIT: 2a12f68d66ed1cbc422f8a92f751d1d6e4c02bdc

Preconditions:

  1. 8.16.0-SNAPSHOT Kibana cloud environment should be available.
  2. Multiple spaces should be created.
  3. No agent should be installed.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Login to the fresh 8.16.0 SNAPSHOT.
  2. Navigate to Space2 and go to Integrations>Nginx>Add integration.
  3. Observe My first agent policy is generated in Space2.
  4. Navigate to Default space and go to Integrations>Nginx>Add integration.
  5. Observe error: Saved object [fleet-agent-policies/fleet-first-agent-policy] conflict.

Expected Result:
Saved object conflict error should be handled while adding integration in default space when My first agent policy is created under Space2.

  • User should be able to add integration to agent policy from Default space when My first agent policy is created under Space2.

Screen Recording:

Agent.policies.-.Fleet.-.Elastic.-.Google.Chrome.2024-10-03.11-25-39.mp4

Feature:
https://github.com/elastic/ingest-dev/issues/1664

@amolnater-qasource amolnater-qasource added bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team labels Oct 3, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/fleet (Team:Fleet)

@amolnater-qasource
Copy link
Author

@muskangulati-qasource Please review.

@muskangulati-qasource
Copy link

Secondary review is Done for this ticket!

@jen-huang
Copy link
Contributor

This will be fixed with #194350. Closing as a dupe of #182736. Please revalidate when that PR has merged and available in a build. Thanks!

@jen-huang jen-huang closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 3, 2024
@amolnater-qasource amolnater-qasource added the QA:Ready for Testing Code is merged and ready for QA to validate label Oct 4, 2024
@amolnater-qasource
Copy link
Author

amolnater-qasource commented Oct 7, 2024

Hi Team,

We have revalidated this issue on latest 8.16.0 SNAPSHOT and found it fixed now.

Observations:

  • User is able to add integration to agent policy from Default space when My first agent policy is created under Space2.

Build details:
VERSION: 8.16.0 SNAPSHOT
BUILD: 78885
COMMIT: 4e4107b

Screen Recording

Agent.policies.-.Fleet.-.Elastic.-.Google.Chrome.2024-10-07.12-38-36.mp4

Hence, we are marking this issue as QA:Validated.

Thanks!!

@amolnater-qasource amolnater-qasource added QA:Validated Issue has been validated by QA and removed QA:Ready for Testing Code is merged and ready for QA to validate labels Oct 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. QA:Validated Issue has been validated by QA Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants