Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[APM] Verify that the APM anomaly threshold rule works with metric-based ML jobs #112794

Closed
dgieselaar opened this issue Sep 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

[APM] Verify that the APM anomaly threshold rule works with metric-based ML jobs #112794

dgieselaar opened this issue Sep 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
@dgieselaar
Labels
apm:ml Integration between APM and ML apm:transaction-metrics APM UI - Transaction Metrics Work Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support

Comments

@dgieselaar
Copy link
Member

dgieselaar commented Sep 22, 2021 •
edited by sorenlouv
Loading

In #111957, we are adding a metric-based ML job. We should verify that the APM anomaly threshold rule works against anomaly data for this job (e.g., it picks the right data).
@dgieselaar dgieselaar added the Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support label Sep 22, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/apm-ui (Team:apm)

@dgieselaar
Copy link
Member Author

Blocked by elastic/elasticsearch#77734.

@sorenlouv sorenlouv added the apm:transaction-metrics APM UI - Transaction Metrics Work label Nov 2, 2021
@sorenlouv sorenlouv added the apm:ml Integration between APM and ML label Nov 19, 2021
@dgieselaar
Copy link
Member Author

There's a bug, described at #126132. I'll close this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dgieselaar dgieselaar

Labels
apm:ml Integration between APM and ML apm:transaction-metrics APM UI - Transaction Metrics Work Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@dannycroft @sorenlouv @dgieselaar @elasticmachine