Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New observability alerting UX report microseconds "μs" instead of milliseconds in reason message for APM Transaction Latency threshold #112245

Closed
cyrille-leclerc opened this issue Sep 15, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #112366
Assignees
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Alerting Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support Theme: rac label obsolete

Comments

@cyrille-leclerc
Copy link
Contributor

cyrille-leclerc commented Sep 15, 2021

Kibana version:

7.15 BC on ESS

Original install method (e.g. download page, yum, from source, etc.):

Describe the bug:

New observability alerting UX report microseconds "μs" instead of milliseconds in reason message for APM Transaction Latency threshold

Moreover, there is a problem with the units in the flyout with the "actual value" and the "expected value"

Configured threshold is 200ms (screenshot below) but threshold in the reason message of a violation is "200μs".

Actual: "Latency is above 200 μs (current value is 388 ms) for frontend"
Expected: "Latency is above 200 ms (current value is 388 ms) for frontend"

image

image

image

@cyrille-leclerc cyrille-leclerc added bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support Feature:Alerting Theme: rac label obsolete labels Sep 15, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/apm-ui (Team:apm)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Alerting Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support Theme: rac label obsolete
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants