At any given time the Kibana team at Elastic is working on dozens of features and enhancements to Kibana and other projects at Elastic. When you file an issue we'll take the time to digest it, consider solutions, and weigh its applicability to both the broad Kibana user base and our own goals for the project. Once we've completed that process we will assign the issue a priority.
- P1: A high priority issue that affects almost all Kibana users. Bugs that would cause incorrect results, security issues and features that would vastly improve the user experience for everyone. Work arounds for P1s generally don't exist without a code change.
- P2: A broadly applicable, high visibility, issue that enhances the usability of Kibana for a majority users.
- P3: Nice-to-have bug fixes or functionality. Work arounds for P3 items generally exist.
- P4: Niche and special interest issues that may not fit our core goals. We would take a high quality pull for this if implemented in such a way that it does not meaningfully impact other functionality or existing code. Issues may also be labeled P4 if they would be better implemented in Elasticsearch.
- P5: Highly niche or in opposition to our core goals. Should usually be closed. This doesn't mean we wouldn't take a pull for it, but if someone really wanted this they would be better off working on a plugin. The Kibana team will usually not work on P5 issues but may be willing to assist plugin developers on IRC.
Let's just get this out there: Feel free to +1 an issue. That said, a +1 isn't a vote. We keep up on highly commented issues, but comments are but one of many reasons we might, or might not, work on an issue. A solid write up of your use case is more likely to make your case than a comment that says +10000.
First of all, sorry about that, we want you to have a great time with Kibana! You should join us on IRC (#kibana on freenode) and chat about it. Github is terrible for conversations. With that out of the way, there are a number of variables that go into deciding what to work on. These include priority, impact, difficulty, applicability to use cases, and last, and importantly: What we feel like working on.
Now we're talking. If you have a bugfix or new feature that you would like to contribute to Kibana, please find or open an issue about it before you start working on it. Talk about what you would like to do. It may be that somebody is already working on it, or that there are particular issues that you should know about before implementing the change.
We enjoy working with contributors to get their code accepted. There are many approaches to fixing a problem and it is important to find the best approach before writing too much code.
Please make sure you have signed the Contributor License Agreement. We are not asking you to assign copyright to us, but to give us the right to distribute your code without restriction. We ask this of all contributors in order to assure our users of the origin and continuing existence of the code. You only need to sign the CLA once.
-
Clone the kibana repo and move into it
git clone https://github.com/elastic/kibana.git kibana cd kibana -
Install the version of node.js listed in the
.node-versionfile (this is made easy with tools like nvm and avn)nvm install "$(cat .node-version)" -
Install dependencies
npm install
-
Start elasticsearch
Note: you need to have a java binary in
PATHor setJAVA_HOME.npm run elasticsearch
-
Start the development server.
npm start
The config/kibana.yml file stores user configuration directives. Since this file is checked into source control, however, developer preferences can't be saved without the risk of accidentally committing the modified version. To make customizing configuration easier during development, the Kibana CLI will look for a config/kibana.dev.yml file if run with the --dev flag. This file behaves just like the non-dev version and accepts any of the standard settings.
The config/kibana.dev.yml file is very commonly used to store some opt-in/unsafe optimizer tweaks which can significantly increase build performance. Below is a commonly used config/kibana.dev.yml file, but additional options can be found in #4611.
optimize:
sourceMaps: '#cheap-source-map' # options -> http://webpack.github.io/docs/configuration.html#devtool
unsafeCache: true
lazyPrebuild: falseWhen Kibana runs in development mode it will automatically use bundled SSL certificates. These certificates won't be trusted by your OS by default which will likely cause your browser to complain about the cert. You can deal with this in a few ways:
- Supply your own cert using the
config/kibana.dev.ymlfile. - Configure your OS to trust the cert: - OSX: https://www.accuweaver.com/2014/09/19/make-chrome-accept-a-self-signed-certificate-on-osx/ - Window: http://stackoverflow.com/a/1412118 - Linux: http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/90607
- Click through the warning and accept future warnings.
- Disable SSL with the
--no-sslflag: -npm start -- --no-ssl
A note about linting: We use eslint to check that the styleguide is being followed. It runs in a pre-commit hook and as a part of the tests, but most contributors integrate it with their code editors for real-time feedback.
Here are some hints for getting eslint setup in your favorite editor:
| Editor | Plugin | | --- | --- | --- | | Sublime | SublimeLinter-eslint | | Atom | linter-eslint | | IntelliJ | Settings » Languages & Frameworks » JavaScript » Code Quality Tools » ESLint | | vi | scrooloose/syntastic |
Another tool we use for enforcing consistent coding style is Editorconfig, which can be set up by installing a plugin in your editor that dynamically updates its configuration. Take a look at the Editorconfig site to find a plugin for your editor, and browse our .editorconfig file to see what config rules we set up.
To ensure that your changes will not break other functionality, please run the test suite and build process before submitting your pull request.
Before running the tests you will need to install the projects dependencies as described above.
Once that is complete just run:
sh
npm run test && npm run build
The standard npm run test task runs several sub tasks and can take several minutes to complete, making debugging failures pretty painful. In order to ease the pain specialized tasks provide alternate methods for running the tests.
npm run test:quick
Runs both server and browser tests, but skips linting
npm run test:server
Run only the server tests
npm run test:browser
Run only the browser tests
npm run test:dev
Initializes an environment for debugging the browser tests. Includes an dedicated instance of the kibana server for building the test bundle, and a karma server. When running this task the build is optimized for the first time and then a karma-owned instance of the browser is opened. Click the "debug" button to open a new tab that executes the unit tests.
npm run mocha [test file or dir] or npm run mocha:debug [test file or dir]
Run a one off test with the local project version of mocha, babel compilation, and optional debugging. Great
for development and fixing individual tests.
This should work super if you're using the Kibana plugin generator. If you're not using the generator, well, you're on your own. We suggest you look at how the generator works.
npm run test:dev -- --kbnServer.testsBundle.pluginId=some_special_plugin --kbnServer.plugin-path=../some_special_plugin
Run the tests for just your particular plugin. Assuming you plugin lives outside of the installedPlugins directory, which it should.
The Selenium server that is started currently only runs the tests in Firefox
The following will start Kibana, Elasticsearch and Selenium for you. To run the functional UI tests use the following commands
npm run test:ui
Run the functional UI tests one time and exit. This is used by the CI systems and is great for quickly checking that things pass. It is essentially a combination of the next two tasks.
npm run test:ui:server
Start the server required for the test:ui:runner tasks. Once the server is started test:ui:runner can be run multiple times without waiting for the server to start.
npm run test:ui:runner
Execute the front-end selenium tests. This requires the server started by the test:ui:server task.
Set your es and kibana ports in test/intern.js to 9220 and 5620, respectively. You can configure your Selenium server to run the tests on Chrome,IE, or other browsers here.
Once you've got the services running, execute the following:
sh
npm run test:ui:runner
- Using Page Objects pattern (https://theintern.github.io/intern/#writing-functional-test)
- At least the initial tests for the Settings, Discover, and Visualize tabs all depend on a very specific set of logstash-type data (generated with makelogs). Since that is a static set of data, all the Discover and Visualize tests use a specific Absolute time range. This guarantees the same results each run.
- These tests have been developed and tested with Chrome and Firefox browser. In theory, they should work on all browsers (that's the benefit of Intern using Leadfoot).
- These tests should also work with an external testing service like https://saucelabs.com/ or https://www.browserstack.com/ but that has not been tested.
- https://theintern.github.io/
- https://theintern.github.io/leadfoot/Element.html
Packages are built using fpm, pleaserun, dpkg, and rpm. fpm and pleaserun can be installed using gem. Package building has only been tested on Linux and is not supported on any other platform.
gem install pleaserun
apt-get install ruby-dev
gem install fpm
npm run build:ospackagesTo specify a package to build you can add rpm or deb as an argument.
npm run build:ospackages -- --rpmDistributable packages can be found in target/ after the build completes.
Push your local changes to your forked copy of the repository and submit a pull request. In the pull request, describe what your changes do and mention the number of the issue where discussion has taken place, eg “Closes #123″.
Always submit your pull against master unless the bug is only present in an older version. If the bug effects both master and another branch say so in your pull.
Then sit back and wait. There will probably be discussion about the pull request and, if any changes are needed, we'll work with you to get your pull request merged into Kibana.
After a pull is submitted, it needs to get to review. If you have commit permission on the Kibana repo you will probably perform these steps while submitting your pull request. If not, a member of the elastic organization will do them for you, though you can help by suggesting a reviewer for your changes if you've interacted with someone while working on the issue.
- Assign the
reviewtag. This signals to the team that someone needs to give this attention. - Assign version tags. If the pull is related to an existing issue (and it should be!), that issue probably has a version tag (eg
4.0.1) on it. Assign the same version tag to your pull. You may end up with 2 or more version tags if the changes requires backporting - Find someone to review your pull. Don't just pick any yahoo, pick the right person. The right person might be the original reporter of the issue, but it might also be the person most familiar with the code you've changed. If neither of those things apply, or your change is small in scope, try to find someone on the Kibana team without a ton of existing reviews on their plate. As a rule, most pulls will require 2 reviewers, but the first reviewer will pick the 2nd.
So, you've been assigned a pull to review. What's that look like?
Remember, someone is blocked by a pull awaiting review, make it count. Be thorough, the more action items you catch in the first review, the less back and forth will be required, and the better chance the pull has of being successful. Don't you like success?
- Understand the issue that is being fixed, or the feature being added. Check the description on the pull, and check out the related issue. If you don't understand something, ask the person the submitter for clarification.
- Reproduce the bug (or the lack of feature I guess?) in the destination branch, usually
master. The referenced issue will help you here. If you're unable to reproduce the issue, contact the issue submitter for clarification - Check out the pull and test it. Is the issue fixed? Does it have nasty side effects? Try to create suspect inputs. If it operates on the value of a field try things like: strings (including an empty string), null, numbers, dates. Try to think of edge cases that might break the code.
- Read the code. Understanding the changes will help you find additional things to test. Contact the submitter if you don't understand something.
- Go line-by-line. Are there style guide violations? Strangely named variables? Magic numbers? Do the abstractions make sense to you? Are things arranged in a testable way?
- Speaking of tests Are they there? If a new function was added does it have tests? Do the tests, well, TEST anything? Do they just run the function or do they properly check the output?
- Suggest improvements If there are changes needed, be explicit, comment on the lines in the code that you'd like changed. You might consider suggesting fixes. If you can't identify the problem, animated screenshots can help the review understand what's going on.
- Hand it back If you found issues, re-assign the submitter to the pull to address them. Repeat until mergable.
- Hand it off If you're the first reviewer and everything looks good but the changes are more than a few lines, hand the pull to someone else to take a second look. Again, try to find the right person to assign it to.
- Merge the code When everything looks good, merge into the target branch. Check the labels on the pull to see if backporting is required, and perform the backport if so.