Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for dynamic pruning on keyword fields #91680

Closed
jpountz opened this issue Nov 18, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Add support for dynamic pruning on keyword fields #91680

jpountz opened this issue Nov 18, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
>enhancement :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories Team:Search Meta label for search team

Comments

@jpountz
Copy link
Contributor

jpountz commented Nov 18, 2022

Description

Lucene added support for dynamic pruning on keyword fields, but we do not leverage it yet in Elasticsearch.

@jpountz jpountz added >enhancement :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories labels Nov 18, 2022
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Search Meta label for search team label Nov 18, 2022
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search (Team:Search)

@cbuescher
Copy link
Member

@jpountz would this help with this request for truncation on keyword fields we discussed recently in the team?

@jpountz
Copy link
Contributor Author

jpountz commented Nov 18, 2022

Sorry, no, it's about making queries sorted by a keyword field smarter to efficiently skip documents that are not competitive instead of naively collecting all the matches of the query.

@jpountz
Copy link
Contributor Author

jpountz commented May 16, 2024

This has been implemented.

@jpountz jpountz closed this as completed May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>enhancement :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories Team:Search Meta label for search team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants