Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Documentation: Add additional details regarding supported Java versions for the Java High Level REST Client #63525

Closed
joshjanoski opened this issue Oct 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Documentation: Add additional details regarding supported Java versions for the Java High Level REST Client #63525

joshjanoski opened this issue Oct 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@lockewritesdocs
Labels
>docs General docs changes >enhancement Team:Docs Meta label for docs team

Comments

@joshjanoski
Copy link

The documentation for the Java High Level REST Client here: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/java-rest/current/java-rest-high-compatibility.html states:

The Java High Level REST Client requires Java 1.8

However, Java 1.8 is just the minimum requirement, and the Java HLRC also supports whatever versions of Java are supported by the associated Elasticsearch release. For example, Elasticsearch 7.9.x supports Java 1.8, 11, 14, and 15, so the 7.9 HLRC will work with all of these Java versions. Requesting that the documentation be updated to clarify that since how it is written right now leads to the assumption that only Java 1.8 will work. Thank you!
@joshjanoski joshjanoski added >enhancement >docs General docs changes needs:triage Requires assignment of a team area label labels Oct 9, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (>docs)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Docs Meta label for docs team label Oct 9, 2020
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer removed the needs:triage Requires assignment of a team area label label Oct 13, 2020
@lockewritesdocs lockewritesdocs self-assigned this Oct 15, 2020
@lockewritesdocs
Copy link
Contributor

lockewritesdocs commented Oct 15, 2020 •
edited
Loading

#63106 already has a fix in place for this clarification.

Duplicate of #63106

@lockewritesdocs lockewritesdocs mentioned this issue Oct 15, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lockewritesdocs lockewritesdocs

Labels
>docs General docs changes >enhancement Team:Docs Meta label for docs team
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@danielmitterdorfer @elasticmachine @lockewritesdocs @joshjanoski