Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Laws are not prominent enough in Haddocks for Divisible and Conquered #52

Open
quasicomputational opened this issue Jun 3, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@quasicomputational
Copy link

The current Haddocks have an intuition-based description of Divisible and Conquered attached to those types, and then a mathematical treatment in a separate section below. However, the laws that the typeclasses must follow are only described in the free-floating lower section and are not specifically attached to their typeclasses. I think this makes the laws too easy to over-look and lose (e.g., by re-exports), and that they are too important to be relegated to a secondary description below the scrolling fold.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant