Check for boolean values where these are mandated

[joncison]

see e.g. edamontology/edamontology#389 although there are other relevant fields, too

[joncison]

am I right @matuskalas this is relevant only for owl:deprecated, i.e. no other fields with bool values?

[matuskalas]

From owl:Class-es, these are:

<owl:deprecated>true</owl:deprecated>
<!-- And a number of technical (i.e. non-semantic) attributes, which we should consider to model in a better way where needed. E.g. -->
<notRecommendedForAnnotation>true</notRecommendedForAnnotation>
<!-- and is_deprecation_candidate, is_refactor_candidate, isdebtag -->

You added all these, so why asking me? 🤣
(i'm no giant fan of myriads of boolean flags after i left my work in retail IT 😉)

[joncison]

:) awesome, thanks!

agree re need to model some of this better

[joncison]

this one done cc @hmenager @albangaignard

see https://github.com/edamontology/edamverify/blob/master/queries/badNonBooleanValue.ipynb

easy to change if we change how we model this stuff