-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reanalysis comparison with observations for energy sector applications #187
Comments
The form says question number 1, the filename says number 2. Which one is the right one? |
Ah, ok, didn't know if it was about this specific issue or what. If it is ment like the second notebook it is 2 |
I'm going to edit the form then. I don't know the exact meaning of the question number, it definitely guarantees unique names. Your colleagues at CNR should know more about it. Please ensure that the notebook name is correct. If you need to make any modifications (e.g., addressing the reviewer's comments), please share the new version of the notebook here, and I will provide a new permalink. Let me know once the notebook is accepted, and I will merge the PR into the main branch. |
Definetely I have to remove numbering from this notebook too |
Ok, here we are reanalysis-era5-monthly-single-levels_validation_q02.zip While I'm at it, the notebook actually addresses both validation and uncertainty. Is there any way to make it appear in the name? |
The assessment categories provided by CNR are available here: https://github.com/ecmwf-projects/c3s2-eqc-quality-assessment?tab=readme-ov-file#naming-convention. With the current design, you can only pick one category, so we would need to add another to cover this case. Note that this change would only affect the file name/URL; the Jupyter book shows the title. Here is the permalink: https://github.com/ecmwf-projects/c3s2-eqc-quality-assessment/blob/b51d877dff27db1201b50935e47ed8761db91616/Reanalyses/reanalysis_reanalysis-era5-single-levels-monthly-means_validation_q02.ipynb |
Ok, thank you, I think in this case it will be fine to leave it as it is. |
The same here, the notebook with one figure parameter reanalysis-era5-monthly-single-levels_validation+uncertainties_q02.zip |
Thank you! |
Hi Chris, I have fixed what you mentioned. Here is the new notebook reanalysis-era5-monthly-single-levels_validation+uncertainties_q02.zip |
Hi Mattia, I noticed that the PREVIEW link points to 404 Page not found (I had reported this by replying to the e-mail but perhaps it was not the right channel). Can you do something about this? Thank you |
My bad, I've been asked to re-open this issue and forgot to trigger the deployment. It should be working in a couple of minutes (let me know if you still see 404 in a few minutes). I also added a few automatic checks to ensure the notebook is aligned with the latest template, and I noticed a minor issue. I had to fix the 'Use Case' heading, so here is the updated permalink: https://github.com/ecmwf-projects/c3s2-eqc-quality-assessment/blob/23dce3831a59c20d3348238d165afb9c7d917eac/Reanalyses/reanalysis_reanalysis-era5-single-levels-monthly-means_validation_q02.ipynb |
Yes it was working then, thank you. Same here please, I have made some changes and need a new permalink. Here is the notebook |
Data Type
Reanalyses
Assessment Category
Validation
Dataset Name
reanalysis-era5-single-levels-monthly-means
Question Number
2
Workflow ID
eqctier3-01c68e35-a5a3-42ca-9424-d3def8a97b3c
Zipped Notebook
reanalysis-era5-monthly-single-levels_validatio_q02.zip
Environment
Anything else we need to know?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: