-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 197
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is offline
mode really offline?
#3177
Comments
The message is printed independently, offline only means that the |
So, why does it contact update sites for |
What do you mean by "forced"? All files (including |
If you see above it says "update mode: forced". In general, I was asking if there's a way to have a full offline mode, where no remote site is contacted (like maven offline mode). |
That's a different topic, and cause because you passing Regardless of that if you see "Downloading from p2" this does not imply the server is really contacted physically. |
You're right about I still see downloading the
So, unless the INFO message is misleading it looks like the server is really contacted physically. Or can I assume it is not contacted? |
How do you "see" downloads?
As said if you specify |
By the way if you think message should be suppressed in offline we can certainly do that, just propose a PR for that. |
See the end of the second line:
The
I was thinking of Maven behavior when offline: of course it fails as you said, but it does not even try to establish a network connection. The INFO message above seems to imply a network connection. |
Best is to try locally with real offline and pass |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
I've just migrated to Tycho 4.0.4 and in my GitHub Actions workflow, when I get a cache hit, I set the Maven option
--offline
. I the log I can seeSo it's being
offline
, but then I can seeSo it looks like it's not really offline?
Am I missing something? Or is it the expected behavior?
thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: