[Model Update]: BOMAsSpecified

[jonbckr]

Update Reason

Request from TC4S:

• BoMAsSpecified describes top down View from a OEM (Producer) of the vehicle. How is this releated to other BOM View (e.g. in Traceability)? As we using common data elements? Shouldn’t we rather have a standardization document on BoM in general and describe, when to use which view (irrespective of a use case)?
  o related to other BOM view in that sense, that they both depict the structure of the specified/buit/etc. asset. In contrast to Traceability, this BOM addresses the full asset how it should be set-up and that an OEM is responsible for. It is not affected by missing supplier as it is in the traceabilty BOMs, where a component cannot be provided as soon as the respective supplier is not part of Catena-X. The BOMAsSpecified tries to cope with the BOM approaches, but cannot be addressed by the same structure and therefor is an own data model
• Which other standards have been looked at before we created our own BoM view? IDTA is currently in the specification phase of a BoM model in Industry4.0 context – has there been any alignment between Catena-X and IDTA?
  o @[email protected]: Habt ihr hier was abgestimmt mit der IDTA zu Hierachical Structures enabling Bills of Material Submodel?
• Why do we create only a BOM without references to other DT?
  o The catenaXIds can be added for self-explanation but the actual lookup should be focused on a combination of ownerPartNumber and ownerId (BPN)
• Description & item category description are 100% identical (copy paste)  does not make sense
  o @[email protected]
• Part: Description is TBD  This is not adequate for public release
  o @[email protected]

MS1 Criteria

• The model that should be updated exists
• The referenced use case exists
• The potential updates are discussed with all stakeholders
• The potential update will be either
  • backward compatible or
  • a (chain of) migration strategy(-ies) from all non-deprecated previous versions to the new model will be developed

[mthiers]

core team:
all points can be omitted according to @tram Kevin except for part description

@Kevinataccenture Kevin tram: will deliver description until 23.01.2023 EOB
MS1 approval given
(@bs-jokri will do post documentation)

[Kevinataccenture]

TBD should be replaced with:
The description of the part in the primary language of the production facility of the product owner.

[mthiers]

The description of the part in the primary language of the production facility of the product owner. -> Done

[bs-jokri]

closed by #48