You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue, as discussed on 2023-03-13 during modelling session.
Several Models (e.g. EsrCertificate, SerialPartTypization#localIdentifiers#manufacturerId, much more) use at least one type of business partner number. There are three types: BNP Legal Entity (BPNL), BPN Site (BPNS), BPN Address (BPNA) representing an unique identifier within Catena-X to indentify a Partner on different levels.
The BPN Shared Aspect should show this relationship. From my understanding, there might be cases where I might allow either a bpns or bpnl to identify a partner. E.g., I as Fraunhofer ISST would be a site who could participate in business relationships on my own. Same would apply to some sites of other partners.
Relevant Standards
EsrCertificate 1.0.1 has a regular Expression matching all BPN types (BPNL, BPNS, BPNA).
Following table might show some example scenarios. For examples of BPNL/S/A, please refer to the linked standards. The first case implies to be modelled as general "BPNL/S/A are specific BPN" (makes overall sense, if your case supports any type of BPN) or to be use case specific "BPN is Either BPNL or BPNA" (that would then not be part of this aspect as it's very specific).
Property
Value
Manufacturer Id
BPNL or BPNS (use case and partner dependent)
Manufacturered at site Id
BPNS
Deliver to address Id
BPNA
MS1 Criteria
The proposed aspect model does not exist already
The proposed aspect model does not extend an existing aspect but introduces completely new functionality
The proposal references a Catena-X use case
Relevant standards are mentioned/linked
A first draft of the data structure is provided in an example
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Model Description
Issue, as discussed on 2023-03-13 during modelling session.
Several Models (e.g. EsrCertificate, SerialPartTypization#localIdentifiers#manufacturerId, much more) use at least one type of business partner number. There are three types: BNP Legal Entity (BPNL), BPN Site (BPNS), BPN Address (BPNA) representing an unique identifier within Catena-X to indentify a Partner on different levels.
The BPN Shared Aspect should show this relationship. From my understanding, there might be cases where I might allow either a bpns or bpnl to identify a partner. E.g., I as Fraunhofer ISST would be a site who could participate in business relationships on my own. Same would apply to some sites of other partners.
Relevant Standards
Example Data
Following table might show some example scenarios. For examples of BPNL/S/A, please refer to the linked standards. The first case implies to be modelled as general "BPNL/S/A are specific BPN" (makes overall sense, if your case supports any type of BPN) or to be use case specific "BPN is Either BPNL or BPNA" (that would then not be part of this aspect as it's very specific).
MS1 Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: