Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Model]: Shared Aspect for BPNL/S/A #105

Closed
5 tasks
tom-rm-meyer-ISST opened this issue Mar 14, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
5 tasks

[New Model]: Shared Aspect for BPNL/S/A #105

tom-rm-meyer-ISST opened this issue Mar 14, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@tom-rm-meyer-ISST
Copy link
Contributor

Model Description

Issue, as discussed on 2023-03-13 during modelling session.
Several Models (e.g. EsrCertificate, SerialPartTypization#localIdentifiers#manufacturerId, much more) use at least one type of business partner number. There are three types: BNP Legal Entity (BPNL), BPN Site (BPNS), BPN Address (BPNA) representing an unique identifier within Catena-X to indentify a Partner on different levels.
The BPN Shared Aspect should show this relationship. From my understanding, there might be cases where I might allow either a bpns or bpnl to identify a partner. E.g., I as Fraunhofer ISST would be a site who could participate in business relationships on my own. Same would apply to some sites of other partners.

Relevant Standards

Example Data

Following table might show some example scenarios. For examples of BPNL/S/A, please refer to the linked standards. The first case implies to be modelled as general "BPNL/S/A are specific BPN" (makes overall sense, if your case supports any type of BPN) or to be use case specific "BPN is Either BPNL or BPNA" (that would then not be part of this aspect as it's very specific).

Property Value
Manufacturer Id BPNL or BPNS (use case and partner dependent)
Manufacturered at site Id BPNS
Deliver to address Id BPNA

MS1 Criteria

  • The proposed aspect model does not exist already
  • The proposed aspect model does not extend an existing aspect but introduces completely new functionality
  • The proposal references a Catena-X use case
  • Relevant standards are mentioned/linked
  • A first draft of the data structure is provided in an example
@bs-jokri
Copy link
Contributor

will be discussed on meeting 03-27

@arnoweiss
Copy link
Contributor

will be solved with result of #103 . Concept agreed, modeling ongoing.

@bs-jokri
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants