You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since this API has not yet been used by any operational system, it should be thoroughly analyzed for technical debts and brought up to date with the latest development practices. Additionally, I want to implement missing integration tests for this interface to ensure its reliability and functionality.
What's the benefit?
Robust and working API which could be used in prod environment.
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
Nothing to report
Detailed explanation
Identification of technical debts, and a comprehensive list of identified debts is documented
As a developer,
I want to identify and remediate the technical debts in the /irs/orders API,
so that it is aligned with the current development standards and is ready for productive usage.
Background
Since this API has not yet been used by any operational system, it should be thoroughly analyzed for technical debts and brought up to date with the latest development practices. Additionally, I want to implement missing integration tests for this interface to ensure its reliability and functionality.
Acceptance Criteria
The /irs/orders API is thoroughly analyzed for technical debts, and a comprehensive list of identified debts is documented.
The /irs/orders API is reviewed and updated to reflect the latest development requirements and best practices.
PBIs are created in BL for remediation of technical debts
Integration tests for the /irs/orders API are created and successfully executed, covering all critical functionalities of the interface.
The results of the integration tests are documented, demonstrating that the API functions correctly and reliably under expected operational conditions.
/irs/orders api is covered with load and stability tests based on current quantity model (20k in 24h/ 200k initial load 5 days)
Test Cases
Test Case 1
Steps
Do something
Click something
Add something
Expected Result
Expectation
Expectation
Expectation
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:
This feature aligns with our current architectural guidelines
The impact on the overall system architecture has been assessed. The Feature does not require changes to the architecture or any existing standard? Please have a look here on the overarching architecture
Potential risks or conflicts with existing architecture has been assessed
Justification:(Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
I am aware that my request may not be developed if no developer can be found for it. I'll try to contribute a developer (bring your own developer)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mkanal
changed the title
[IRS]🌟[SPIKE][IMPL] Remediation of technical Debts /irs/orders api
[IRS]🌟🚀[SPIKE][IMPL] Remediation of technical Debts /irs/orders api
Oct 23, 2024
Overview
Explain the topic in 2 sentences
Since this API has not yet been used by any operational system, it should be thoroughly analyzed for technical debts and brought up to date with the latest development practices. Additionally, I want to implement missing integration tests for this interface to ensure its reliability and functionality.
What's the benefit?
Robust and working API which could be used in prod environment.
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
Detailed explanation
Identification of technical debts, and a comprehensive list of identified debts is documented
Current implementation
Proposed improvements
Feature Team
Contributor
Committer
User Story
As a developer,
I want to identify and remediate the technical debts in the /irs/orders API,
so that it is aligned with the current development standards and is ready for productive usage.
Background
Since this API has not yet been used by any operational system, it should be thoroughly analyzed for technical debts and brought up to date with the latest development practices. Additionally, I want to implement missing integration tests for this interface to ensure its reliability and functionality.
Acceptance Criteria
Test Cases
Test Case 1
Steps
Expected Result
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:
Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: