Release notes for 0.10.0 #2766

SueChaplain · 2018-09-05T13:55:37Z

To support the upcoming 0.10.0 release for
fixes #2765

Modifications made to the 0.9.0 release notes
to add and fix some links to binaries at AdoptOpenJDK.

Signed-off-by: Sue Chaplain [email protected]

SueChaplain · 2018-09-05T13:57:17Z

@pshipton For some reason I thought we were removing the list of functional tests in 0.9.0 but they are still there. Let me know if you want them taken out of 0.9.0 and/or 0.10.0.

I'm sure there is a lot more to go in here but we have a starting position.

pshipton · 2018-09-05T15:39:44Z

I'm ok to remove the list of open test failures from the release notes. They aren't necessarily just functional test failures, I see at least 3 system test failures in the list for 0.9.0.
@mstoodle @DanHeidinga @smlambert

mstoodle · 2018-09-15T04:04:23Z

Looks basically ok to me.

Under "Notable changes in this release", I notice there's nothing about JDK 11 features. Maybe we should have at least a short list of the JDK11 JEPs that make an appearance in OpenJ9 0.10.0?

Normally, one would expect the updates you're making to the 0.9.0 release notes to go into a separate commit from the commit creating the 0.10.0 release notes.

SueChaplain · 2018-09-17T09:58:36Z

I can add the JEPs. Looking at the issues list I see 8 for JDK 11.

323 is closed
181 looks like it will complete for 0.10.0
318 targeted for 0.12.0
rest are open (309,320,327,328,331) and not associated with a release.

@pshipton - is this accurate please? Just 181 and 323 for the release notes.

I can put the 0.9.0 changes into another commit.

pshipton · 2018-09-17T12:31:03Z

@SueChaplain
318 (#1370) is functionally complete (in 0.9.0) but the testing is not yet completed.
181 (#2108), 309 (#954), 320 (#992), 327 (#1875) will be complete for 0.10.0 as they are Java 11 "required" features.
328 (#1876) is not supported by OpenJ9.
331 (#2679) will not be complete for 0.10.0

pshipton · 2018-09-17T12:48:15Z

Also note there are JEPs in Java 11 OpenJDK which don't require anything from OpenJ9

http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/
321: HTTP Client (Standard)
323: Local-Variable Syntax for Lambda Parameters
324: Key Agreement with Curve25519 and Curve448
329: ChaCha20 and Poly1305 Cryptographic Algorithms
330: Launch Single-File Source-Code Programs
332: Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.3
335: Deprecate the Nashorn JavaScript Engine
336: Deprecate the Pack200 Tools and API

pshipton · 2018-09-29T12:47:50Z

doc/release-notes/0.10/0.10.md

+<tr><td valign="top"><a href="https://github.com/eclipse/openj9/issues/479">#479</a></td>
+<td valign="top">Non-compressed references VM builds not available</td>
+<td valign="top">AIX, Windows, Linux on Z, Linux on Power</td>
+<td valign="top">Heaps larger than 57GB are not supported.</td>


I wonder if this should be re-worded. They are supported, at least on Linux on X, and should work on all other platforms if built.

I had a go at re-wording. Let me know if you want changes.

pshipton · 2018-09-29T12:49:11Z

doc/release-notes/0.10/0.10.md

+</tr>
+
+<tr><td valign="top"><a href="https://github.com/ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk8/issues/17">#17</a></td>
+<td valign="top">Builds contain extra shared libraries.</td>


This only applies to Java 8 (and 10) now. The issue is resolved for Java 11 (and 0.10.0 is a Java 11 only release).

pshipton · 2018-09-29T13:01:12Z

fyi @SueChaplain you can use keywords to auto-close the issue when the PR is merged. I've already changed it.
https://help.github.com/articles/closing-issues-using-keywords/

DanHeidinga · 2018-10-02T14:37:54Z

doc/release-notes/0.10/0.10.md

+
+- [OpenJDK version 11](https://adoptopenjdk.net/nightly.html?variant=openjdk11&jvmVariant=openj9)
+
+Builds are tested against the OpenJ9 functional verification (FV) test suite, the OpenJDK test suites, and additional tests at AdoptOpenJDK. At this stage the builds are compatible, but not compliant with OpenJDK 11.


but not compliant with OpenJDK 11. This isn't an OpenJ9 statement. Compliance is tracked with the "blue checkmark" at Adopt.

pshipton · 2018-10-02T20:40:27Z

doc/release-notes/0.10/0.10.md

+<tr><td valign="top"><a href="https://github.com/eclipse/openj9/issues/479">#479</a></td>
+<td valign="top">Non-compressed references VM builds not available</td>
+<td valign="top">AIX, Windows, Linux on Z, Linux on Power</td>
+<td valign="top">Non-compressed references VM builds, which support heaps larger than 57GB are supported on Linux on x86. Non-compressed references builds for other platforms are not available at AdoptOpenJDK.</td>


I still don't like the wording. As @DanHeidinga pointed out elsewhere, "not available at AdoptOpenJDK" is an Adopt statement, not OpenJ9. From an OpenJ9 point of view, non-compressed refs is supported for all platforms, but only tested nightly for Linux x86.

I'm wondering why we have this as a limitation at all. Perhaps I should just remove it? Or do you want a statement that we are not testing the other platforms? If someone builds it and finds a problem I'm guessing that we would help fix it.

Its more like a FAQ than limitation but we could just say "Non-compressed references VM builds, which support heaps larger than 57GB, are built on Linux on x86." Which keeps the info about manual builds for other platforms.

pshipton · 2018-10-03T13:40:55Z

The final release tags for 0.10.0 have been created.

pshipton · 2018-10-03T13:51:48Z

doc/release-notes/0.10/0.10.md

+
+## Binaries and supported environments
+
+This release adds compatibility with OpenJDK v11. We expect a binary of OpenJDK 11 with OpenJ9 to be available from the AdoptOpenJDK community in the near future at the following link:


Seems this statement should be updated since the link is now active. Also I'm wondering if this should link to the actual release page when it is created.

To support the upcoming 0.10.0 release for issue eclipse-openj9#2765 Modifications made to the 0.9.0 release notes to add and fix some links to binaries at AdoptOpenJDK. [skip-ci] Signed-off-by: Sue Chaplain <[email protected]>

SueChaplain requested a review from pshipton September 5, 2018 13:56

SueChaplain force-pushed the release0.10.0 branch 2 times, most recently from 5843fae to 10e1932 Compare September 11, 2018 16:03

SueChaplain mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2018

Add soft maximum bytes to the shared cache statistics in Javacore file eclipse-openj9/openj9-docs#83

Closed

SueChaplain force-pushed the release0.10.0 branch from 10e1932 to c2a92bb Compare September 17, 2018 10:03

SueChaplain force-pushed the release0.10.0 branch 4 times, most recently from 6dbc514 to 27fd75c Compare September 24, 2018 11:24

pshipton reviewed Sep 29, 2018

View reviewed changes

SueChaplain changed the title ~~[WIP] Release notes for 0.10.0~~ Release notes for 0.10.0 Oct 2, 2018

SueChaplain force-pushed the release0.10.0 branch from 27fd75c to 4377257 Compare October 2, 2018 13:37

DanHeidinga reviewed Oct 2, 2018

View reviewed changes

SueChaplain force-pushed the release0.10.0 branch from 4377257 to 6747db8 Compare October 2, 2018 15:06

pshipton reviewed Oct 2, 2018

View reviewed changes

pshipton mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2018

Investigate JVM signal handling functions #54

Closed

SueChaplain force-pushed the release0.10.0 branch 2 times, most recently from d7ba938 to 1293613 Compare October 3, 2018 12:51

pshipton reviewed Oct 3, 2018

View reviewed changes

SueChaplain force-pushed the release0.10.0 branch from 1293613 to c417749 Compare October 3, 2018 16:04

Release notes for 0.10.0

20f4460

To support the upcoming 0.10.0 release for issue eclipse-openj9#2765 Modifications made to the 0.9.0 release notes to add and fix some links to binaries at AdoptOpenJDK. [skip-ci] Signed-off-by: Sue Chaplain <[email protected]>

SueChaplain force-pushed the release0.10.0 branch from c417749 to 20f4460 Compare October 3, 2018 16:19

pshipton approved these changes Oct 3, 2018

View reviewed changes

pshipton merged commit 0076965 into eclipse-openj9:master Oct 3, 2018

SueChaplain deleted the release0.10.0 branch October 4, 2018 08:37

pshipton added the comp:doc label Oct 15, 2018

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Release notes for 0.10.0 #2766

Release notes for 0.10.0 #2766

SueChaplain commented Sep 5, 2018 •

edited by pshipton

Loading

SueChaplain commented Sep 5, 2018

pshipton commented Sep 5, 2018

mstoodle commented Sep 15, 2018

SueChaplain commented Sep 17, 2018

pshipton commented Sep 17, 2018 •

edited

Loading

pshipton commented Sep 17, 2018

pshipton Sep 29, 2018

SueChaplain Oct 2, 2018

pshipton Sep 29, 2018

SueChaplain Oct 2, 2018

pshipton commented Sep 29, 2018 •

edited

Loading

DanHeidinga Oct 2, 2018

SueChaplain Oct 2, 2018

pshipton Oct 2, 2018

SueChaplain Oct 3, 2018

pshipton Oct 3, 2018

pshipton commented Oct 3, 2018

pshipton Oct 3, 2018


		- [OpenJDK version 11](https://adoptopenjdk.net/nightly.html?variant=openjdk11&jvmVariant=openj9)

		Builds are tested against the OpenJ9 functional verification (FV) test suite, the OpenJDK test suites, and additional tests at AdoptOpenJDK. At this stage the builds are compatible, but not compliant with OpenJDK 11.


		## Binaries and supported environments

		This release adds compatibility with OpenJDK v11. We expect a binary of OpenJDK 11 with OpenJ9 to be available from the AdoptOpenJDK community in the near future at the following link:

Release notes for 0.10.0 #2766

Release notes for 0.10.0 #2766

Conversation

SueChaplain commented Sep 5, 2018 • edited by pshipton Loading

SueChaplain commented Sep 5, 2018

pshipton commented Sep 5, 2018

mstoodle commented Sep 15, 2018

SueChaplain commented Sep 17, 2018

pshipton commented Sep 17, 2018 • edited Loading

pshipton commented Sep 17, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pshipton commented Sep 29, 2018 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pshipton commented Oct 3, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SueChaplain commented Sep 5, 2018 •

edited by pshipton

Loading

pshipton commented Sep 17, 2018 •

edited

Loading

pshipton commented Sep 29, 2018 •

edited

Loading