Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

print warning when @Setting is not defined into a ServiceExtension implementation #227

Closed
ndr-brt opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #228
Closed

print warning when @Setting is not defined into a ServiceExtension implementation #227

ndr-brt opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #228
Assignees
Labels
feature_request New feature request, awaiting triage triage all new issues awaiting classification

Comments

@ndr-brt
Copy link
Member

ndr-brt commented Mar 18, 2024

Feature Request

currently a lot of @Setting are excluded from the autodoc manifests because they are not defined into ServiceExtension implementation as they should be.

Which Areas Would Be Affected?

autodoc

Why Is the Feature Desired?

Are there any requirements?

Solution Proposal

If possible, provide a (brief!) solution proposal.

@ndr-brt ndr-brt added triage all new issues awaiting classification feature_request New feature request, awaiting triage labels Mar 18, 2024
@ndr-brt ndr-brt self-assigned this Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature_request New feature request, awaiting triage triage all new issues awaiting classification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant