Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adoption Request: Extend Policy Definition entity with Private Properties #3567

Closed
1 task
suh-rao opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3576
Closed
1 task

Adoption Request: Extend Policy Definition entity with Private Properties #3567

suh-rao opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3576
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@suh-rao
Copy link
Contributor

suh-rao commented Oct 25, 2023

Adoption Request

Adding private properties to policy definition entity.

General information

Extending policy definition entity with the map privateProperties. Additionally, adjust the affected transformers, search in privateProperties and policy definition API managements accordingly. The functionality would support in-memory and postgres as a store.

Adoption level

Next, please tell us what level of adoption you intend to provide. (pick only one)

  • Reference a feature as "friend"
  • [ X] Incorporate a feature as core EDC component

Adoption in EDC core

If you chose to add your feature as a core EDC component, please answer the following questions.

Why should this contribution be adopted?

This feature is similar to what is currently available for Asset entity. Therefore, the required contribution for the policy definition to enable the private properties looks very similar.

Could it be achieved with existing functionality? If not, why?

No. This is a completely new field withing the policy definition entity.

Are there multiple use cases or applications who will benefit from the contribution?

Yes, same as Asset entity.

Can it be achieved without introducing third-party dependencies? If not, which ones?

Yes

Would this feature limit platform independence in any way? If so, how and why?

No.

Is it going to be a self-contained feature, or would it cut across the entire code base?

a self-contained feature.

Reference items:
#2592 (reply in thread)

@github-actions
Copy link

Thanks for your contribution 🔥 We will take a look asap 🚀

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2023

This issue is stale because it has been open for 14 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Open for x days with no activity label Nov 9, 2023
@ndr-brt ndr-brt added enhancement New feature or request and removed stale Open for x days with no activity feature_request New feature request, awaiting triage triage all new issues awaiting classification labels Nov 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment