Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FsVault: Better compatibility of FsVault with OpenSSL for EC key generation #3562

Closed
thomasrutger opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
feature_request New feature request, awaiting triage triage all new issues awaiting classification

Comments

@thomasrutger
Copy link

Feature Request

When using the FsVault, I tried to use OpenSSL together with keytool to generate the Keystore with the EC keys. However, this is apparently not supported and I read that I should use Keystore Explorer instead to generate keys. This is inconvenient when you want to generate keys from a script.

Additionally, it seems that the keys are converted to PEM format before they are used. So why not just configure the keys in PEM files directly, instead of using JKS?

Which Areas Would Be Affected?

FsVault

Why Is the Feature Desired?

Better compatibility with standard tooling

Solution Proposal

  • Change current implementation such that EC keys created using OpenSSL + keytool
  • Configure using PEM files directly instead of JKS (considering they are converted to PEM anyway)
@thomasrutger thomasrutger changed the title Better compatibility of FsVault with OpenSSL for EC key generation FsVault: Better compatibility of FsVault with OpenSSL for EC key generation Oct 24, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Thanks for your contribution 🔥 We will take a look asap 🚀

@ndr-brt ndr-brt added feature_request New feature request, awaiting triage triage all new issues awaiting classification labels Oct 24, 2023
@eclipse-edc eclipse-edc locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 25, 2023
@ndr-brt ndr-brt converted this issue into discussion #3566 Oct 25, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
feature_request New feature request, awaiting triage triage all new issues awaiting classification
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants