-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build and publish multi-platform developer images #20862
Comments
For downstream developer images (UDI) see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CRW-2463 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CRW-2464 (requires #19953 ) If upstream is not multiarch (because we can't use buildx on Z) that should not prevent downstream from being multiarch. Note too that downstream does not support |
Issues go stale after Mark the issue as fresh with If this issue is safe to close now please do so. Moderators: Add |
Downstream no longer has to split between TP and GA as we have added labels into the dashboard. There are also no openj9 images anymore. #20799 (comment) So while we still need multiarch downsteam, the same Dockerfile might be possible for up and downstream. We might still filter out some languages that are not supported downstream. |
Issues go stale after Mark the issue as fresh with If this issue is safe to close now please do so. Moderators: Add |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after Mark the issue as fresh with If this issue is safe to close now please do so. Moderators: Add |
Is your enhancement related to a problem? Please describe
We are currently only building
linux/amd64
developer images.Describe the solution you'd like
linux/amd64
,linux/arm64
,linux/ppc64le
andlinux/s390x
versions of the images.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: