Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: new endblock response including new rollapp consensus params #112

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

srene
Copy link
Contributor

@srene srene commented Aug 13, 2024

Description


Closes #111

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow-up issues.

PR review checkboxes:

I have...

  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Targeted PR against the correct branch
  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Linked to the GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design
  • Targets only one GitHub issue
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Wrote relevant migration scripts if necessary
  • All CI checks have passed
  • Added relevant godoc comments
  • Updated the scripts for local run, e.g genesis_config_commands.sh if the PR changes parameters
  • Add an issue in the e2e-tests repo if necessary

SDK Checklist

  • Import/Export Genesis
  • Registered Invariants
  • Registered Events
  • Updated openapi.yaml
  • No usage of go map
  • No usage of time.Now()
  • Used fixed point arithmetic and not float arithmetic
  • Avoid panicking in Begin/End block as much as possible
  • No unexpected math Overflow
  • Used sendCoin and not SendCoins
  • Out-of-block compute is bounded
  • No serialized ID at the end of store keys
  • UInt to byte conversion should use BigEndian

Full security checklist here

----;

For Reviewer:

  • Confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Reviewers assigned
  • Confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed

---;

After reviewer approval:

  • In case the PR targets the main branch, PR should not be squash merge in order to keep meaningful git history.
  • In case the PR targets a release branch, PR must be rebased.

@srene srene requested a review from a team as a code owner August 13, 2024 16:02
@srene srene marked this pull request as draft August 13, 2024 16:02
@srene srene self-assigned this Aug 14, 2024
@srene srene marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2024 16:10
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Aug 23, 2024
@omritoptix
Copy link
Contributor

@srene conflicts

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Aug 25, 2024
@srene
Copy link
Contributor Author

srene commented Aug 29, 2024

closing it since it is replaced by #122

@srene srene closed this Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add new endblocker that includes new consensus params in the response
2 participants