Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

regul weights as reported in rei file #36

Open
jknightusgs opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

regul weights as reported in rei file #36

jknightusgs opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@jknightusgs
Copy link

this is more of a question than an issue:

I ran the same pest control file using pest++ and pest14.02. (Freyberg_pp_reg.pst from class).

In pest++, the weights listed in the rei file for regularization obs (i.e. log(hk1_1) - log(hk1_2) = 0) are square roots of the weights listed in the pst file and rec file.

In pest 14.02, the weights are identical in the various input/output files. Why the difference in pest++?

I noticed this because after running the calibration in pest++, a dataframe produced from the rei file showed a regul component of PHI that was much larger than what I saw in the end-of-run info on the command prompt.

@jtwhite79
Copy link
Contributor

Hey Jake - I can confirm that the prior information equation weights in the residuals file is the sqrt of what is in the control file. Not sure what the origin of that is, but, as of v4.2.2 in my fork of pest++ (https://github.com/jtwhite79/pestpp), this has been changed so that the reporting is consistent with pest(_hp).

@jknightusgs
Copy link
Author

thanks Jeremy. I wasn't aware of the fork on your account, so I'm glad I asked. The user manual I found there is a game changer! Much appreciation for all the work you put into that.

@jtwhite79
Copy link
Contributor

I can't take credit for that manual - its was mostly hard work from @doherty1234

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants