Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

* add the possibility to use ${session.user} for variable expansion in r... #521

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

strima
Copy link

@strima strima commented Aug 22, 2013

...emote urls

we needed this, since some values in the generated select boxes shall only be shown to certain users/groups

@gschueler
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the pull request. I think I would change "session.user" to "job.username", just so it is more consistent with the variables available at Job execution time.

@strima
Copy link
Author

strima commented Aug 23, 2013

You're welcome.

First: Shall it be job.username or job.user.name so that you could also do something like job.user.mail, job.user.surname, ... ?

Second: Since i'm fairly new to github workflow, shall i do the change based on my current version or should i rebase on dev tree, and then send a new pull request or can i extend this request ?

mfg

@gschueler
Copy link
Member

job.user.name sounds good.

The best workflow is to put the changes on a separate branch and pull request from that. Then if necessary you can rebase on our dev branch and force push to your separate branch again, and the pull request will reflect that.

For this pull request, feel free to rebase or not. As long as you push to the same branch you sent the pull request from, the changes will show up here I believe.

@gschueler
Copy link
Member

merged in and made the job.user.name change in #494

@gschueler gschueler closed this Aug 24, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants