-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spmi-diff is showing diffs that are not related to the PR #74287
Comments
@dotnet/jit-contrib |
I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label. |
Interesting. The second diff looks like RBO. Maybe the baseline jit is not getting updated or something? |
I did check the GUIDs and they look accurate. For example, #74090 the baseline is supposed to be Even the
|
Seems like those are GUIDs for |
Locally (making changes on top of 9cd1a32) I don't see any spurious diffs. |
And for that even superpmi diff is clean. https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1950687&view=ms.vss-build-web.run-extensions-tab |
Look in the "setup" leg for the jit download from the cloud -- eg from https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1954972&view=logs&jobId=011e1ec8-6569-5e69-4f06-baf193d1351e&j=011e1ec8-6569-5e69-4f06-baf193d1351e&t=bf6cf4cf-6432-59cf-d384-6b3bcf32ede2 We should surface this warning more visibly |
So evidently, we're missing some baseline jits. |
Yep, I was trying to find where that is logged. Thanks for finding it. |
I see that they are getting uploaded correctly in the rolling jit build job. |
I forgot that for baseline jit, we go with the git_hash. |
If I look at the (internal) baseline JIT pipeline https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build?definitionId=902, it hasn't built all the JIT changes merged to public 'main'. |
It would help if we suppressed some of the download progress status messages. |
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure Issue DetailsI believe there is something wrong with spmi-diff pipeline. Even for PRs that shouldn't have code diffs is showing diffs.
I looked into the Likewise, below diff is unrelated to #74090 as well as #74110.
|
@kunalspathak This has been understood and resolved, so I'm going to close it. |
I believe there is something wrong with spmi-diff pipeline. Even for PRs that shouldn't have code diffs is showing diffs.
I looked into the
spmi-diff
for #74090 and the diffs looks unrelated. The following diff is coming from #74110, but is reported in #74090.Likewise, below diff is unrelated to #74090 as well as #74110.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: