Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PartitionKey support with Cosmos EFCore #20307

Closed
balukantu opened this issue Mar 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

PartitionKey support with Cosmos EFCore #20307

balukantu opened this issue Mar 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
closed-no-further-action The issue is closed and no further action is planned. customer-reported

Comments

@balukantu
Copy link

Hi Team,

I am working on an Azure Cosmos Db and planning to integrate EFCore. I have gone through the documentation and identified the point Entity types with partition keys don't work correctly in some scenarios.

So Can't we work efficiently with partition keys in EFCore? or As it is mentioned, can you list out the scenarios where it will not work?

Below are a few scenarios, where we use the partition key.

  1. Pass partition key when creating, updating, deleting or retrieving a record. Link
  2. Pass partition key when executing a LINQ based on the partition key. Cosmos: Add explicit partition key support for queries #17320
@balukantu balukantu changed the title Partition support with Cosmos EFCore PartitionKey support with Cosmos EFCore Mar 17, 2020
@AndriySvyryd
Copy link
Member

I've addressed your questions in dotnet/EntityFramework.Docs#2184

@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd added the closed-no-further-action The issue is closed and no further action is planned. label Mar 18, 2020
@ajcvickers ajcvickers reopened this Oct 16, 2022
@ajcvickers ajcvickers closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed-no-further-action The issue is closed and no further action is planned. customer-reported
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants