Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spin off configuration schema generator as a standalone package #3309

Open
pedropaulovc opened this issue Mar 31, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Spin off configuration schema generator as a standalone package #3309

pedropaulovc opened this issue Mar 31, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
area-integrations Issues pertaining to Aspire Integrations packages
Milestone

Comments

@pedropaulovc
Copy link

Autocomplete of Aspire configs in appsettings.json is fantastic as my project is growing. I would love to have this capability in my projects as well. Also, I'm using keyed component resolution and the default Aspire schema doesn't know what's the key I'm using in my code. Looks like this capability is handled by the configuration schema generator introduced in #1383 . The team should consider spinning off this capability as an extension package for 3P usage.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-integrations Issues pertaining to Aspire Integrations packages label Mar 31, 2024
@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

This is the plan right @eerhardt?

@eerhardt
Copy link
Member

eerhardt commented Apr 8, 2024

This is the plan right @eerhardt?

Yes, we will need to do something here if we want to build Aspire Components outside of the dotnet/aspire repo.

@aaronpowell
Copy link
Contributor

We're wanting to use this in the Community Toolkit (tracking CommunityToolkit/Aspire#112), what would be required to ship this as a .NET CLI tool that we could use, even if it was on a package feed other than nuget.org.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-integrations Issues pertaining to Aspire Integrations packages
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants