Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: search titles containing ignored characters #1395

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Nov 8, 2020

Conversation

sy-records
Copy link
Member

Summary

If ignore is set, we should remove it from the search title

image

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Docs
  • Build-related changes
  • Repo settings
  • Other, please describe:

If changing the UI of default theme, please provide the before/after screenshot:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

  • When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. fix #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)

You have tested in the following browsers: (Providing a detailed version will be better.)

  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari
  • Edge
  • IE

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature
  • Related documents have been updated
  • Related tests have been updated

To avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a feature request issue first and wait for approval before working on it.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 13, 2020

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/docsify-core/docsify-preview/adjwbyz46
✅ Preview: https://docsify-preview-git-fix-search-2.docsify-core.vercel.app

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2020

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit a6e9c37:

Sandbox Source
docsify-template Configuration

Copy link
Member

@anikethsaha anikethsaha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Can you write tests for this if possible ?

Koooooo-7
Koooooo-7 previously approved these changes Oct 13, 2020
Copy link
Member

@Koooooo-7 Koooooo-7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As @anikethsaha said, try to write a test, so do I. 😜

@sy-records
Copy link
Member Author

Waiting for the #1398 merge to fix CI

@sy-records sy-records merged commit a2ebb21 into docsifyjs:develop Nov 8, 2020
@sy-records sy-records deleted the fix-search-2 branch November 8, 2020 08:48
jhildenbiddle added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
commit a2ebb21
Author: 沈唁 <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Nov 8 16:48:43 2020 +0800

    fix: search titles containing ignored characters (#1395)

    * fix: search titles containing ignored characters

    * fix

    * add default value

    * add test

    * fix test

    Co-authored-by: Koy <[email protected]>

commit 58fbca0
Author: Snyk bot <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Nov 5 03:04:19 2020 +0200

    fix: packages/docsify-server-renderer/package.json & packages/docsify-server-renderer/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities (#1418)

    The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
    - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-DOMPURIFY-1035544
@sy-records sy-records mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2021
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants