Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

openjdk:8-jre-alpine contains CVE-2018-1000654 #283

Closed
alicancakil opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

openjdk:8-jre-alpine contains CVE-2018-1000654 #283

alicancakil opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@alicancakil
Copy link

Description:

GNU Libtasn1-4.13 libtasn1-4.13 version libtasn1-4.13, libtasn1-4.12 contains a DoS, specifically CPU usage will reach 100% when running asn1Paser against the POC due to an issue in _asn1_expand_object_id(p_tree), after a long time, the program will be killed. This attack appears to be exploitable via parsing a crafted file.

Vendor Score (CVSS v2)
7.1 High (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C)

NVD Score (CVSS v2)
7.1 High (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C)

NVD Reference:
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2018-1000654

@wglambert
Copy link

See docker-library/postgres#286 (comment) and https://github.com/docker-library/faq#why-does-my-security-scanner-show-that-an-image-has-so-many-cves

Do you know if this package on Alpine is patched or updated for this CVE? We're beholden to upstream in this regard and cannot simply alleviate CVE issues with their packages.
With Debian we refer to their CVE tracker https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-1000654 which notes that the issue is unfixed. Given that, I don't see anything actionable.

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Feb 20, 2019

Debian also notes it has "No security impact", which is interesting.

Closing since there's not really anything we can do here. 👍

@tianon tianon closed this as completed Feb 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants