We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi Tim, At 02:31 AM 07-07-2018, Tim Wicinski wrote:
There were initial concerns that the IPR was unclear, and never fully settled. All the guidance I received was that the issue would be addressed https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2909/ Yes, it is old, but it was the only reference I could dig up.
There were initial concerns that the IPR was unclear, and never fully settled. All the guidance I received was that the issue would be addressed
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2909/
Yes, it is old, but it was the only reference I could dig up.
Thank you for the URL. The Tracker does not list the IPR disclosure for the WG draft. I suggest looking at Section 3.3 of RFC 6702 [1].
Regards, S. Moonesamy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi Tim,
At 02:31 AM 07-07-2018, Tim Wicinski wrote:
Thank you for the URL. The Tracker does not list the IPR disclosure
for the WG draft. I suggest looking at Section 3.3 of RFC 6702 [1].
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: