Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
tcp: add tcp_v4_fill_cb()/tcp_v4_restore_cb()
James Morris reported kernel stack corruption bug [1] while running the SELinux testsuite, and bisected to a recent commit bffa72c ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg") We believe this commit is fine, but exposes an older bug. SELinux code runs from tcp_filter() and might send an ICMP, expecting IP options to be found in skb->cb[] using regular IPCB placement. We need to defer TCP mangling of skb->cb[] after tcp_filter() calls. This patch adds tcp_v4_fill_cb()/tcp_v4_restore_cb() in a very similar way we added them for IPv6. [1] [ 339.806024] SELinux: failure in selinux_parse_skb(), unable to parse packet [ 339.822505] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: ffffffff81745af5 [ 339.822505] [ 339.852250] CPU: 4 PID: 3642 Comm: client Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1-test rib#15 [ 339.868498] Hardware name: LENOVO 10FGS0VA1L/30BC, BIOS FWKT68A 01/19/2017 [ 339.885060] Call Trace: [ 339.896875] <IRQ> [ 339.908103] dump_stack+0x63/0x87 [ 339.920645] panic+0xe8/0x248 [ 339.932668] ? ip_push_pending_frames+0x33/0x40 [ 339.946328] ? icmp_send+0x525/0x530 [ 339.958861] ? kfree_skbmem+0x60/0x70 [ 339.971431] __stack_chk_fail+0x1b/0x20 [ 339.984049] icmp_send+0x525/0x530 [ 339.996205] ? netlbl_skbuff_err+0x36/0x40 [ 340.008997] ? selinux_netlbl_err+0x11/0x20 [ 340.021816] ? selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x211/0x230 [ 340.035529] ? security_sock_rcv_skb+0x3b/0x50 [ 340.048471] ? sk_filter_trim_cap+0x44/0x1c0 [ 340.061246] ? tcp_v4_inbound_md5_hash+0x69/0x1b0 [ 340.074562] ? tcp_filter+0x2c/0x40 [ 340.086400] ? tcp_v4_rcv+0x820/0xa20 [ 340.098329] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x71/0x1a0 [ 340.111279] ? ip_local_deliver+0x6f/0xe0 [ 340.123535] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x3a0/0x3a0 [ 340.135523] ? ip_rcv_finish+0xdb/0x3a0 [ 340.147442] ? ip_rcv+0x27c/0x3c0 [ 340.158668] ? inet_del_offload+0x40/0x40 [ 340.170580] ? __netif_receive_skb_core+0x4ac/0x900 [ 340.183285] ? rcu_accelerate_cbs+0x5b/0x80 [ 340.195282] ? __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60 [ 340.207288] ? process_backlog+0x95/0x140 [ 340.218948] ? net_rx_action+0x26c/0x3b0 [ 340.230416] ? __do_softirq+0xc9/0x26a [ 340.241625] ? do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 [ 340.253368] </IRQ> [ 340.262673] ? do_softirq+0x50/0x60 [ 340.273450] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x57/0x60 [ 340.285045] ? ip_finish_output2+0x175/0x350 [ 340.296403] ? ip_finish_output+0x127/0x1d0 [ 340.307665] ? nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 [ 340.318230] ? ip_output+0x72/0xe0 [ 340.328524] ? ip_fragment.constprop.54+0x80/0x80 [ 340.340070] ? ip_local_out+0x35/0x40 [ 340.350497] ? ip_queue_xmit+0x15c/0x3f0 [ 340.361060] ? __kmalloc_reserve.isra.40+0x31/0x90 [ 340.372484] ? __skb_clone+0x2e/0x130 [ 340.382633] ? tcp_transmit_skb+0x558/0xa10 [ 340.393262] ? tcp_connect+0x938/0xad0 [ 340.403370] ? ktime_get_with_offset+0x4c/0xb0 [ 340.414206] ? tcp_v4_connect+0x457/0x4e0 [ 340.424471] ? __inet_stream_connect+0xb3/0x300 [ 340.435195] ? inet_stream_connect+0x3b/0x60 [ 340.445607] ? SYSC_connect+0xd9/0x110 [ 340.455455] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xaf/0x100 [ 340.466112] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1d0/0x2b0 [ 340.476636] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x209/0x290 [ 340.487151] ? SyS_connect+0xe/0x10 [ 340.496453] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x1b0 [ 340.506078] ? entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 Fixes: 971f10e ("tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce cache line misses") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Reported-by: James Morris <[email protected]> Tested-by: James Morris <[email protected]> Tested-by: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information