Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

outreach to potential implementers #187

Open
balmas opened this issue Oct 5, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

outreach to potential implementers #187

balmas opened this issue Oct 5, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@balmas
Copy link
Contributor

balmas commented Oct 5, 2020

Maybe we should have a place to keep track of applications and projects which might be interested in implementing a DTS API.

The recently announced Patristic Text Archive (https://pta.bbaw.de/pta/) is using Capitains Guidelines for its XML and might be worth approaching .It looks like they're using this application for their interface: https://www.bbaw.de/en/bbaw-digital/telota/research-and-software/ediarum it has an API https://github.com/ediarum/ediarum.WEB/blob/master/API.md and maybe they'd be interested in adding DTS support?

@pharos-alexandria
Copy link

Yes, we are – at least in the longer run.

@balmas
Copy link
Contributor Author

balmas commented Oct 5, 2020

:-) wonderful!

@balmas
Copy link
Contributor Author

balmas commented Oct 29, 2020

Another very nice project with an api serving TEI XML: https://github.com/VedaWebPlatform/vedaweb (https://vedaweb.uni-koeln.de/)

@mromanello
Copy link

Good idea @balmas !
Along the same note, why not having an "outreach" label for GH issues, so that people can exchange about outreaching activities (e.g. presentations about DTS)?

@mromanello
Copy link

Pinging @PonteIneptique 👋 for having an "outreach" label in GH issue tracker (I dont' have rights to create a new one)

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member

outreach

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants