Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Thanks for writing this proposal. On it's own the proposed extension looks reasonable, but I fear we do need to perform more design work here as the postgres documentation outlines quite a few other syntax variants there that might interact with filter clauses in this location. This becomes especially important if you also want to support window functions which have a syntax part that looks essentially the same. We also need to research if other backends might support this syntax as well. At least for window functions (+filter) that seems the case for SQLite. The good news is that I'm already working on implementing window functions so there will likely be a better starting point published in the next few weeks. At least in my local draft this also enables |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've found myself needing Postgres' aggregate function filtering, e.g.
It appears to not be implemented yet, so I've sketched out this rough implementation if you're open to a PR for it?
Usage:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions