Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

no link to "group homomorphism" in one context, yes in another - ? #41

Open
holtzermann17 opened this issue May 17, 2013 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@holtzermann17
Copy link
Collaborator

http://planetmath.org/grouphomomorphism (term links to its own definition which in general I think we don't want, but it does show that linking works)

http://planetmath.org/node/87423#comment-19453 (doesn't work)

@dginev
Copy link
Owner

dginev commented May 17, 2013

The first case is surprising, I thought I had fixed that.

The second is a result of the clustering algorithm being picky. There is still fine-tuning remaining to be done there.

@dginev
Copy link
Owner

dginev commented May 17, 2013

Which means I will look into both and I will get back to you.

@ghost ghost assigned dginev May 20, 2013
@dginev
Copy link
Owner

dginev commented Jul 11, 2013

Moving to 3.0 milestone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants