QA Standards - Public Websites - Discharge Upgrade Wizard

[it-harrison]

General Information

VFS team name

Public Websites

VFS product name

Discharge Upgrade Wizard

VFS feature name

Point of Contact/Reviewers

@it-harrison - Ian Harrison - QA

---

QA Standards

Regression Test Plan

• Standard has been met
• Standard has not been met

Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

Since this is an upgrade to the existing tool, there should be a Regression Test Plan.

Test Plan

• Standard has been met
• Standard has not been met

Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

The QA documents states that: "The team manually tested all flows and branching logic with each complete user story. We tested edit question flows on the review page along with navigation when editing a question." But the specific tests performed are not further documented, in particular the results of the tests are not included.

Traceability Reports

• Standard has been met
• Standard has not been met

Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

E2E Test Participation

• Standard has been met
• Standard has not been met

Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

Unit Test Coverage

• Lines %: 70.29

• Functions %: 71.37

• Statements %: 70.38

• Branches %: 46.22

• Standard has been met

• Standard has not been met

Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

Endpoint Monitoring (Completed Playbook)

• Standard has been met
• Standard has not been met

Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

Logging Silent Failures

• Standard has been met
• Standard has not been met

Explanation of failure to meet standard (if applicable):

No logging silent failures artifact provided

Next Steps for the VFS team

• Questions? For the most timely response, comment on Slack in your team channel tagging @platform-governance-team-members with any questions or to get help validating the issue.
• Close the ticket when your Product Owner determines that you have sufficiently met the QA Standards.

Platform directions

• Update "Issue Title" to be of the form "QA Standards - VFS Team - VFS Product"
• Add the VFS team, product name, and feature name
• Add your name, practice area, and GH handle under Point of Contact/Reviewers
• Complete the QA Standards section, making sure to include an "Explanation of failure to meet standard" for every Standard the product does not meet.
• Link to the Collaboration Cycle Request epic
• Add epic's milestone
• Add assignees:
  • VFS PM
  • Yourself (optional)
• Add labels:
  • VFS team label
  • VFS product label
  • QA-standards label
  • launch-blocking label if the product has failed to meet a required QA Standard