Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: consider conquer-once or lock_api instead of spin #3770

Closed
trivikr opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

deps: consider conquer-once or lock_api instead of spin #3770

trivikr opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@trivikr
Copy link
Contributor

trivikr commented Jan 24, 2020

I ran cargo audit on deno by following instructions in blog post

Output:

    Fetching advisory database from `https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db.git`
      Loaded 69 security advisories (from /home/trivikr/.cargo/advisory-db)
    Scanning Cargo.lock for vulnerabilities (203 crate dependencies)
     Success No vulnerable packages found

warning: 1 warning found

Crate:  spin
Title:  spin is no longer actively maintained
Date:   2019-11-21
URL:    https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2019-0031
Dependency tree: 
spin 0.5.2
└── ring 0.16.9
    ├── webpki 0.21.0
    │   ├── webpki-roots 0.17.0
    │   │   ├── reqwest 0.10.1
    │   │   │   └── deno 0.30.1
    │   │   │       └── test_plugin 0.0.1
    │   │   └── deno 0.30.1
    │   ├── tokio-rustls 0.12.2
    │   │   ├── reqwest 0.10.1
    │   │   ├── hyper-rustls 0.19.0
    │   │   │   └── reqwest 0.10.1
    │   │   └── deno 0.30.1
    │   ├── rustls 0.16.0
    │   │   ├── tokio-rustls 0.12.2
    │   │   ├── rustls-native-certs 0.1.0
    │   │   │   └── hyper-rustls 0.19.0
    │   │   ├── reqwest 0.10.1
    │   │   └── hyper-rustls 0.19.0
    │   ├── hyper-rustls 0.19.0
    │   └── deno 0.30.1
    ├── sct 0.6.0
    │   ├── rustls 0.16.0
    │   └── ct-logs 0.6.0
    │       └── hyper-rustls 0.19.0
    ├── rustls 0.16.0
    └── deno 0.30.1

warning: 1 warning found!
@trivikr
Copy link
Contributor Author

trivikr commented Jan 24, 2020

Closing as spin is not a direct dependency
Refs: briansmith/ring#921

@trivikr trivikr closed this as completed Jan 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant