You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem
During the YAML validation PR, I realized that the distinction between BasePipeline and Pipeline is rather blurry and probably unnecessary. See this comments for more context: #2226 (comment)
Solution
We should probably have a single, non-abstract Pipeline base class which can be used as-is or subclassed by others, like RayPipeline.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ZanSara
changed the title
I agree, that the purpose of BasePipeline vanishes with deleting the "generic" load_from_config that would delegate between it's subclasses Pipeline and RayPipeline depending on the config's pipeline type. All the deepset_cloud methods could as well be part of Pipeline. So let's leave it like that and think about redesigning BasePipeline/Pipeline or even adding DeepsetCloudPipeline in a separate issue/PR.
Re-evaluate BasePipelineMar 11, 2022
Problem
During the YAML validation PR, I realized that the distinction between
BasePipeline
andPipeline
is rather blurry and probably unnecessary. See this comments for more context: #2226 (comment)Solution
We should probably have a single, non-abstract
Pipeline
base class which can be used as-is or subclassed by others, likeRayPipeline
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: