Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Jeremy's select v. selector content #6148

Open
1 task done
alison985 opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Add Jeremy's select v. selector content #6148

alison985 opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
community Contributions from the dbt community content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear

Comments

@alison985
Copy link
Contributor

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

Node selection content.

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

I was teaching node selection to our team here today and a member found this gem 💎 by @jeremyyeo ❤️ https://gist.github.com/jeremyyeo/1aeca767e2a4f157b07955d58f8078f7 I think it's worth including in the documentation.

FWIW, in terms of sequence I went through the Node Selection pages in the Reference section, then went through Jeremy's explanation of the difference.

Additional information

No response

@alison985 alison985 added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear labels Sep 25, 2024
@matthewshaver matthewshaver added the community Contributions from the dbt community label Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community Contributions from the dbt community content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants