-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reactive DOM engine based on AsyncRx? #46
Comments
Very interesting. I haven't seen anything like that before. I had some ideas of bringing Reaction to JS by perhaps just using RxJS instead of AsyncRx. I don't think there's much overhead with AsyncRx as WebPack will tree-shake so you only get the functions you actually use. |
It's not about tree-shaking. I realize this is more related to how fable optimize immutable structures when transpiling to js objects. solidjs provides an immutable API over js (mutable) objects, directly wiring reactive stuff into the DOM. Doing the same sort of thing for fable should be at lower level than AsynRx.
Actually,
|
Syme, D. (2006). Initializing mutually referential abstract objects: The value recursion challenge. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 148(2), 3-25. |
Do you think we can take AsyncRx directly into the DOM stuff and make our own Reactive view engine like solidjs ? Should the transpiling of rx stuff add too much overhead ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: