Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Depend upon FilePathsBase instead of FilePaths #128

Closed
frankier opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Depend upon FilePathsBase instead of FilePaths #128

frankier opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@frankier
Copy link

frankier commented Aug 5, 2024

Might it be possible to depend upon FilePathsBase rather than FilePaths? I'm having some problems with FilePaths and this might help, plus it could improve compilation speed.

Let me know if you would like me to put together a PR.

@frankier
Copy link
Author

@davidanthoff
Copy link
Owner

We depend on FilePaths.jl because we need the integration with URIs.jl, which is not part of FilePathsBase.jl...

@SimonDanisch
Copy link
Contributor

Is that absolutely necessary, or could we simply extract some functions and handle things a bit more manually?
FilePaths seems to be pretty horrible for load times and I didn't realize how much it was until now (from ~4s to 6s load time in Makie).

@frankier
Copy link
Author

frankier commented Mar 4, 2025

Yeah FilePaths.jl is effectively deprecated. I've fixed my old PR here: #140

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants