-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New release failing on pandas master #297
Comments
Is it reasonable to have |
Yes, I think that's a good idea anyway. Do you want to open an issue about that? But for the actual issue, I am trying to understand what the code does. As it might be that the change in pandas is kind of a regression for this usecase. What is the reason you need to re-create the datetimetz block? As in the first loop when creating the columns you already do a |
The first dataframe contains blocks of zero size, and here they are recreated with the required size. I don't know of a different way to do this :| |
Ah, yes, I see. The |
As far as I can see, this is a regression in |
Thanks for looking into it, @jorisvandenbossche |
See comment of @jreback what should be used instead: pandas-dev/pandas#19431 (comment) |
this is going to be changed very soon |
The new release breaks some of our tests. It seems that we adapted the signature of
make_block_same_class
(in pandas-dev/pandas#19265). Maybe we should also fix this temporarily in pandas by putting it backThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: