Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DEBUG log messages imply UCX config options are invalid #4845

Closed
rlratzel opened this issue May 24, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4850
Closed

DEBUG log messages imply UCX config options are invalid #4845

rlratzel opened this issue May 24, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4850

Comments

@rlratzel
Copy link

When debugging is enabled, distributed outputs the following messages:

distributed.comm.ucx - DEBUG - Key: cuda_copy with value: False not a valid UCX configuration option.
distributed.comm.ucx - DEBUG - Key: tcp with value: False not a valid UCX configuration option.
distributed.comm.ucx - DEBUG - Key: nvlink with value: False not a valid UCX configuration option.
distributed.comm.ucx - DEBUG - Key: infiniband with value: False not a valid UCX configuration option.
distributed.comm.ucx - DEBUG - Key: rdmacm with value: False not a valid UCX configuration option.
distributed.comm.ucx - DEBUG - Key: net-devices with value: None not a valid UCX configuration option.
distributed.comm.ucx - DEBUG - Key: reuse-endpoints with value: None not a valid UCX configuration option.

When the corresponding env vars as set, such as export DASK_UCX__CUDA_COPY=True, the code in ucx.py here seems to behave correctly, but the check here still fails and prints the debug messages.

This can be seen simply by setting:

export DASK_LOGGING__DISTRIBUTED="DEBUG"

and running the scheduler like so:

python -m distributed.cli.dask_scheduler

Since the default values even cause the debug messages to be printed, there's no need to set the UCX config options to see the debug messages above.

@quasiben @pentschev

@pentschev
Copy link
Member

Thanks @rlratzel , I think this was just a bug in how we were checking variables but wasn't harmful, that should now be addressed in #4850 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants