You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There may be a bug that when non-zero namelist options are used for: config_berg_initial_uvelocity_geo config_berg_initial_vvelocity_geo
that they may not be used correctly due to a missing halo exchange. This arose during testing of small non-zero values for these options (along with config_use_berg_velocity_solver = false), where the parallelism test would fail for differences only in uBergVelocity, vBergVelocity.
The interpolation call seaice_interpolate_cell_to_vertex is done in a block loop in the subroutine init_berg_velocity, so I believe this subroutine would need to be pulled out of that block loop.
Recording this as an issue for my own tracking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There may be a bug that when non-zero namelist options are used for:
config_berg_initial_uvelocity_geo
config_berg_initial_vvelocity_geo
that they may not be used correctly due to a missing halo exchange. This arose during testing of small non-zero values for these options (along with
config_use_berg_velocity_solver = false
), where the parallelism test would fail for differences only inuBergVelocity, vBergVelocity
.The interpolation call
seaice_interpolate_cell_to_vertex
is done in a block loop in the subroutineinit_berg_velocity
, so I believe this subroutine would need to be pulled out of that block loop.Recording this as an issue for my own tracking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: