Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configuration help link "Open Coexistence Documentation" is wrong in Device Configurator 3.10 #3

Open
k6dsp opened this issue Dec 4, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@k6dsp
Copy link

k6dsp commented Dec 4, 2021

Prerequisites

Can you reproduce the problem reliably? Yes in Device Configurator 3.10

Did you check current release notes for known issues? It is latest release of MTB

If this is not the latest release, have you checked newer releases?

Description:
cypresssemiconductorco.github.io
Greetings Earthling!
When we relocated Cypress content to github.com/Infineon, we redirected the documentation links. Clearly we missed the link you clicked.

Substitute Infineon.github.io for cypresssemiconductorco.github.io and the link should work.

If you think this is worth fixing, please raise an issue on this repository:

https://github.com/cypresssemiconductorco/cypresssemiconductorco.github.io

In the issue, please paste the link that got you here, and we’ll fix it. If not, then go forth with our sincere apologies and thanks for your patience.

A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

The link is https://cypresssemiconductorco.github.io/coex/coex_api_reference_manual/html/index.html

Steps to Reproduce:

Expected Result:

Actual Result:

Frequency (1/1, 1/50, 1/100):

Build/Commit:

Please specify the release, like 1.4.1. If there is no release, give us the commit for the code you used.

Target:

The chip or kit you are working with

Host OS and Version:

MacOS, Windows, Linux

Compiler:

Include the version!

Environment

Provide the context surrounding this problem. Perhaps an IDE, a debug probe, an RTOS, etc. (and versions)

THANKS!
@rmbk19
Copy link

rmbk19 commented Dec 17, 2021

Hi @k6dsp,

Thank you for pointing this out. I will raise an internal ticket to get this fixed.

Regards,
Rakshith

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants